part one: In your first set of readings and lecture we covered how the discipline has a difficult time narrowing down a definition of intelligence. Do we really need one? Why or why not?

The many pitfalls of intelligence analysis make working in a group a challenge. What issues do you foresee in working in your groups?

If we think of security as ideology, how might the Soviet Union have interpreted or understood security?
(400words)

part two: ill send you two different people summary please write each one a positive feedback (75words each)