Our Advantage

  • 100 % Original
  • Any Urgency
  • Over 500 Writers
  • 15% Discount
  • No Hidden Charges
  • 24/7 Live Support
  • Secured Payments
  • High Quality Paper
  • Privacy Guaranteed
  • Any Citation Style

MSITM6320_ResearchArticleReview_Rubric.xlsx

Sheet1

MSITM 6320 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT – RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRIC
SNOCriteriaWeightScoreExcellentGoodFairBelow Proficient
1Content ofReview40%In depth analysis of the content (all major points discussed). Excellent summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, both indicate the overall focus of the paper Points : 40Comprehensive analysis of the content (most of the major points discussed). Adequate summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with considerable clarity, but lacks insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, paper focus inconsistently supported. Points : 34Minimal analysis of the content (some of the major points discussed). Basic summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insight. Introduction and conclusion do not indicate the overall focus of the paper. Points : 28No content (missed all major points of the content). Incomplete summary. Key ideas/themes/findings are not communicated clearly and/or missed in analysis. There is no clear introduction or conclusion Points : 24
2Reflection30%Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications. Points : 30Demonstrates considerable understanding of the article by listing all of the key findings. Points : 25Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key findings…but documentation is lacking in completeness. Points : 21Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings reported. Points: 18
3Organization & Development of Ideas15%Logical development of ideas through welldeveloped paragraphs, good use of transitions. Points : 15Logical organization, paragraph development not perfected. Points : 12Logical organization, paragraphs not fully developed. Points : 10No evidence of structure or organization. Points: 08
4Mechanics15%Meets length requirement. 1-2 grammatical errors. 1-2 punctuation errors. APA 7 Guidelines are meticulously followed. Adheres to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 15Length requirement is met with adequate content 3-4 grammatical errors. 3-4 punctuation errors. Adheres consistently to APA 7 guidelines, however, one error present. Adheres to either Font or Spacing Guidelines, but not both. Points : 12Length requirement is not met; minimal content 5-6 grammatical errors 5-6 punctuation errors Demonstrates little ability to adhere to APA 7 guidelines, more than two errors present Adheres to neither Font nor Spacing Guidelines Points : 10Length requirement is not met; poor content Numerous grammatical errors (distracting) Numerous punctuation errors APA 7 format is not used Does not adhere to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 08
TOTAL100%
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes